Sculptuur van een consul 1646 - 1670

Editor: Here we have "Sculptuur van een consul" by Hubert Quellinus, created sometime between 1646 and 1670. It’s a pen drawing, residing here at the Rijksmuseum. It's fascinating how such simple materials capture so much detail. What’s your perspective on this representation? Curator: This work presents us with an interesting look at how authority was perceived and presented in the Dutch Golden Age. Consider the deliberate choice of depicting a Roman consul. Why look back to antiquity for models of leadership in 17th century Holland? Editor: Is it meant to be aspirational? A nod to the ideals of Roman governance? Curator: Precisely! Think about the political climate of the Dutch Republic at that time. They had just fought for their independence and were forging a new identity. Looking to the Roman Republic, with its emphasis on civic virtue and leadership, provided a powerful framework for legitimizing their own political structures. But also think about the function this imagery served in the domestic space of wealthy merchants. How does an image of public authority function when privately consumed? Editor: So the drawing served as a daily reminder or symbol of those virtues within a home? Almost like propaganda but for a small audience? Curator: In a sense, yes. But also consider the power of classical imagery as a status symbol, linking the owner to a world of education and refined taste. It shows how art, even within the private sphere, played a key role in constructing and reinforcing social hierarchies. Now, what is your take on this? What do you feel seeing this drawing? Editor: That’s a really good point! It’s made me think about the politics embedded in seemingly straightforward portraiture. I guess I didn't really see all the social levels at play here, but it adds a lot of nuance. Thanks!