Portret van Johann Wenzel Graf von Wratislaw und Mitrowitz by Martin Bernigeroth

Portret van Johann Wenzel Graf von Wratislaw und Mitrowitz 1711 - 1733

0:00
0:00

engraving

# 

portrait

# 

baroque

# 

old engraving style

# 

limited contrast and shading

# 

history-painting

# 

engraving

Dimensions: height 149 mm, width 90 mm

Copyright: Rijks Museum: Open Domain

Curator: The formality in this piece really sets a tone. Editor: It's quite striking, isn’t it? Here we have an engraving, "Portret van Johann Wenzel Graf von Wratislaw und Mitrowitz," dating roughly from 1711 to 1733, attributed to Martin Bernigeroth. It resides in the Rijksmuseum. The details in this engraving are mesmerizing. Curator: Absolutely. The limited contrast almost feels deliberate, highlighting the textures, particularly the subject’s extravagant wig. It frames his face with such calculated excess. Editor: Exactly! The wig isn’t just an accessory; it's a potent symbol of status and power. Look at the details in the lace, too, and the crest beneath the portrait. How might Wratislaw’s role as Chancellor of Bohemia shape his identity? His religious background of Magnus Prior Melitenfis, combined with being Bohemia's Chancellor is also very interesting, two roles. Curator: That coat of arms serves as a signifier, instantly aligning him with noble lineage, of course. But it's how those symbols work together – the lace, the wig, the coat of arms, it all paints a portrait, not just of an individual, but of an era consumed by courtly display. A baroque demonstration of position. Editor: It makes you think about performativity and power during that time, the way identities were carefully constructed and projected through visual cues. Was this representation accessible, or who would even see such a piece? This wouldn’t have been just any photo; it was strategic communication of who Wratislaw was, for his audience. Curator: Precisely, which makes this engraving itself a significant artifact. It's an accessible record of the culture and of Johann’s presence and influence at court. It goes beyond personal likeness and acts as cultural memory and evidence. Editor: The questions the artwork raises are, can we see beyond these layers? Are we forever blocked from the genuine person underneath the symbols? Curator: That might be its most powerful aspect for us, as modern viewers. The emotional distance that this portrait creates reminds us how our perceptions of the past are filtered and curated. We are allowed only glimpses of calculated significance. Editor: The calculated image is certainly the key here, creating that deliberate cultural memory you talk about, showing how constructed identity transcends eras.

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.