Smid aan het werk in zijn smidse 1870 - 1923

Editor: This watercolor by Willem Witsen, "Smith at Work in his Forge," probably created sometime between 1870 and 1923, depicts exactly what the title suggests. It strikes me how gritty and realistic it feels. What can you tell me about it? Curator: Well, let's consider the social context here. Witsen captures a tradesman, a smith. It's important to acknowledge that depicting manual labor was not always considered a worthy subject in fine art. But, the intense concentration on his face. He is consumed in making something of value to his community, something real. What does that mean in relation to say paintings of landscapes and aristocrats at the time? Editor: I see what you mean. I hadn't considered that his choice of subject matter challenges what was traditionally deemed appropriate for "high art". It is craft depicted as fine art. Curator: Exactly. Notice the meticulous detail given to the tools and equipment within the forge itself. Witsen highlights the material processes—the sheer physicality—of this occupation, almost emphasizing labor. Can you see how that elevation might reflect changing societal values or, perhaps, a rising interest in the lives of the working class during the late 19th and early 20th centuries? How does his careful application of watercolor heighten or obscure his intent, and is it different had he decided to employ another painting material such as oils or gouache? Editor: That’s a good point. Watercolour gives it an approachable realness that oil paint might not have done. So, this piece is not just about representing a scene, but also about the value we place on the labor involved in crafting something tangible. I will consider it now when thinking of art’s social and labor contexts. Curator: Indeed. Appreciating the ‘means of production,’ shall we say, changes how we understand both art and the world around it.