Letter S c. 16th century

Editor: Here we have "Letter S" by an anonymous artist. It's giving me illuminated manuscript vibes, but how would you interpret its purpose in society, given its anonymity? Curator: Well, anonymity often points to a craft tradition. This likely wasn't conceived as high art, but as part of broader visual culture, perhaps for printing or decorative purposes. How does its potential mass production affect its perceived value? Editor: That's interesting. So its value isn’t necessarily in the individual artistry, but in its role within a larger system of communication? Curator: Precisely. It highlights how art serves various functions beyond individual expression. It also begs us to ask, how do we value the work of anonymous creators? Editor: That's a really important question. I'll definitely be thinking about the politics of imagery and authorship now.