Candlestick (one of a pair) 1753 - 1755

Editor: Here we have a pair of silver candlesticks crafted by Emanuel Drentwett around 1753 to 1755. The ornate, almost flowing designs give them such a regal, luxurious feel. What historical context should we keep in mind when considering these objects? Curator: Think about what these objects *do*. They illuminate. What does that mean in the 18th century? This isn't just about seeing to read a book; it's about signaling wealth and power. Candles, especially displayed in such elaborate holders, weren’t cheap. Silver itself, of course, had high intrinsic value but also prestige in that time. It reflects social standing. Editor: So these weren't just decorative, they were communicating something? Curator: Exactly! Consider where these objects were displayed, who saw them, and what those people knew about social hierarchies. These candlesticks are from the late Baroque period. Baroque design itself was frequently linked to assertions of authority and opulence by European monarchs and aristocracy, thus we can assume this played a huge role here as well. How do these ideas connect to decorative art pieces generally? Editor: It's interesting to consider how decorative arts objects became powerful tools of social messaging in that era. So it’s like… form *following* societal *function* in a pretty direct way, isn’t it? Curator: Absolutely! These objects underscore the complex role art can play, not just reflecting culture but actively participating in it. Think of the institutions that supported and displayed pieces like this—and what they were *really* endorsing through their curation. Editor: I never really considered art in terms of social messaging but I can now clearly appreciate what you're saying. That really changes how I view these beautiful works. Curator: Indeed, seeing art as inextricably intertwined with history and cultural forces unlocks a new dimension of appreciation.