Aquarius - Jolly Young Watermen from George Cruikshank's Steel Etchings to The Comic Almanacks: 1835-1853 (top left) by George Cruikshank

Aquarius - Jolly Young Watermen from George Cruikshank's Steel Etchings to The Comic Almanacks: 1835-1853 (top left) c. 1846 - 1880

0:00
0:00

Dimensions: 214 × 338 mm (primary support); 343 × 509 mm (secondary support)

Copyright: Public Domain

Editor: So, this is "Aquarius - Jolly Young Watermen" by George Cruikshank, dating somewhere between 1846 and 1880. It's an etching, and it definitely has a lively, almost chaotic energy to it. What kind of symbols do you think Cruikshank is playing with here? Curator: The energy you feel, the chaotic composition, stems from its roots in the carnivalesque. Think back to those ancient celebrations, reversals of power, playful chaos, a release of social tensions through symbolic acts. Here, the watermen aren't just spraying water; it's a ritual cleansing, perhaps even a baptism – but turned upside down, a comic, rebellious gesture. What societal norms do you imagine Cruikshank is subtly poking fun at with this exaggerated water display? Editor: I guess it could be about critiquing the upper classes, making fun of their rigid social rules and maybe even hygiene habits? But, like, through water fights? Curator: Exactly. Water, traditionally a symbol of purity and cleansing, becomes a weapon of joyful anarchy. It is about more than just the upper classes. It is about a momentary escape from social constraints, a temporary subversion. Notice how the figures seem to be caught in a moment of surprise, some joyful and others less so. What do their expressions tell you about their relationship to the established order? Editor: That some people are annoyed by the interruption? Almost as if to imply society isn't necessarily interested in being cleansed. Curator: Precisely. And that's where the enduring power of symbols lies: they reflect our own shifting interpretations, mirroring the continuous negotiation between tradition and rebellion. Seeing it this way, does the print gain a new, richer, perhaps even more pertinent dimension? Editor: Absolutely. I came in thinking it was just a silly scene, but there’s so much more happening beneath the surface. Thanks!

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.