Mensaap copuleert met een vrouw door de spijlen van zijn kooi by Felicien Rops

Mensaap copuleert met een vrouw door de spijlen van zijn kooi 1864

0:00
0:00

drawing, ink, pen

# 

portrait

# 

drawing

# 

pen sketch

# 

figuration

# 

ink

# 

ink drawing experimentation

# 

group-portraits

# 

pen work

# 

symbolism

# 

pen

# 

nude

# 

erotic-art

Dimensions: height 171 mm, width 130 mm

Copyright: Rijks Museum: Open Domain

Curator: This is "Mensaap copuleert met een vrouw door de spijlen van zijn kooi" (Ape copulating with a woman through the bars of his cage), a drawing by Felicien Rops from 1864. What strikes you when you first look at it? Editor: The frantic energy, certainly. The loose, scratchy penwork lends this sense of frenetic movement. There's a voyeuristic element, and even some kind of carnavalesque frenzy... and then you realize someone's in a cage! Curator: Yes, Rops pulls no punches! Created with pen and ink, the medium itself seems perfectly suited to capturing the raw, unsettling quality of the subject. Editor: I'm fascinated by the economy of line. Rops uses so little to convey so much. This feels so purposefully hand-made, so deliberate in its challenging the divide between "high" art and what was then considered base erotica. What were the conditions that would allow Rops to imagine something like this? Curator: Rops was known for his symbolist and often controversial themes, wasn’t he? There's this dance between the refined and the depraved that really speaks to the societal tensions of his time. Editor: Exactly! It's all about class and gender and commodification. Rops implicates the viewer. What do we consume? What titillates us? Where does power truly reside in these exchanges? The rough, unpolished nature of the ink drawing emphasizes labor and exposure. Curator: Right, the discomfort is definitely intentional. It feels less like pure eroticism and more like a grotesque commentary. I think this drawing shows a deep cynicism—a questioning of social boundaries, perhaps even a self-critique as an artist complicit in that spectacle. Editor: I concur completely. Rops presents us with something uncomfortable so we question what our comfort requires. Considering it’s at the Rijksmuseum now, how does it shift the material conditions, so to speak, of the drawing? Curator: Well, to see it now is to consider how those taboos shifted, but how power remains unbalanced even still. The monkey in a cage copulating behind bars implicates and disturbs. Editor: Absolutely. And that, ultimately, is a lasting achievement.

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.