Dimensions: overall: 6.1 x 27.2 cm (2 3/8 x 10 11/16 in.)
Copyright: National Gallery of Art: CC0 1.0
Curator: This drawing, made with pen and ink and perhaps meant to be an engraving, depicts an "Ancient Triumphal Procession." The artist is Daniel Lindtmayer. It certainly seems to borrow heavily from imagery associated with ancient Greek and Roman art. Editor: It strikes me as frenetic, a swirl of bodies and movement crammed into a long, horizontal format. There's almost too much to take in at once! Curator: The dynamism, yes, quite deliberate. Consider the recurring motifs: centaurs, mythological figures, creatures half-human and half-animal, and cupids swirling about them all. It suggests an attempt to link specific symbolic significance to a sense of cultural memory around triumphal celebrations. Editor: I agree, and what is worth noting is whose memories, which are more than probably idealized versions from dominant historical accounts. Who does a "triumph" benefit or impact most, who is represented, and what's erased here? I would propose we reflect on this a bit... Curator: Absolutely. There is always a deliberate choice of which images and symbols a culture chooses to remember, even to idealize, but I tend to find those that point toward fundamental myths that repeat in history particularly resonant, as this procession presents here, in its chaotic joy. Note also the triumphal chariot pulled by bulls and that large container that seemingly carries bounty. Editor: All of this does call into question power dynamics, then and now, as such symbolism and imagery become shorthand to consolidate identity. This image acts like a propaganda poster promoting specific historical agendas through visual shorthand, erasing critical nuance. Curator: Though the agenda is unclear now and might even have alluded to something outside contemporary ideas about political power. Looking back from the present, what can we tell ourselves about humanity and the use of myth that seems continuous? I still see some common joy here, too, though of course a selective, idealized form. Editor: Perhaps a more critical viewing can offer a nuanced reading against any notion of pure universal joy. The value for today may involve acknowledging how visual spectacle is manipulated to uphold authority. Curator: I see that angle quite clearly now, it will remain, a helpful addition. Editor: I find the layered reading both insightful and sobering. Perhaps our discussion can provoke deeper consideration as viewers move through the exhibition.
Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.