Portret van Johann Georg Sulzer by Heinrich Pfenninger

Portret van Johann Georg Sulzer 1759 - 1815

0:00
0:00

print, engraving

# 

portrait

# 

neoclacissism

# 

print

# 

old engraving style

# 

historical photography

# 

engraving

Dimensions: height 117 mm, width 82 mm

Copyright: Rijks Museum: Open Domain

Curator: Standing before us is Heinrich Pfenninger’s "Portret van Johann Georg Sulzer," an engraving probably created sometime between 1759 and 1815. It's deceptively simple at first glance, wouldn't you agree? Editor: It strikes me as remarkably stern, even somber. The tight framing within the oval and the limited tonal range create a somewhat claustrophobic feel. There is not much "joy of life" shining here, if you see what I mean? Curator: Absolutely. Pfenninger captures Sulzer, the Swiss-German aesthetician, with a kind of austere elegance befitting his philosophical leanings. Observe the meticulous cross-hatching that defines his features, creating a texture almost palpable. Editor: It's intriguing how the light catches the brow and the folds around the eyes, lending him a world-weary appearance, perhaps even a hint of melancholy. It’s masterfully rendered, technically speaking, within a classical framework, with all that implied stoicism and virtue, wouldn’t you agree? Curator: Yes, the Neoclassical influence is evident in its restrained emotion and emphasis on reason. What I find especially interesting is the way the printmaking technique itself—with its emphasis on line and form—mirrors Sulzer's own philosophical project of defining and systematizing aesthetic experience. It feels very contained! Editor: Precisely! It seems the very process of engraving serves to categorize and analyze, much like Sulzer himself! The inscription—the clear labeling of the subject, like an specimen—underscores the work's objective, documentary nature. I wonder if Sulzer approved, even as the style hints at how very cool headed this piece feels to modern eyes. Curator: I agree; there is a strange mix of detachment and careful study, which keeps the subject distant even while highlighting very particular details of his presentation. A successful fusion of subject and approach then, I think. Editor: I concur. There's something enduring in its meticulousness, a certain quality of intense observation, which almost invites us to ponder both the surface and its less obvious depths, after all this time.

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.