Portret van Clovis III by Jean Frosne

Portret van Clovis III 1633 - 1676

0:00
0:00

engraving

# 

portrait

# 

baroque

# 

old engraving style

# 

personal sketchbook

# 

history-painting

# 

engraving

Dimensions: height 201 mm, width 133 mm

Copyright: Rijks Museum: Open Domain

Curator: Look at this compelling baroque engraving, likely produced between 1633 and 1676, titled "Portret van Clovis III" and attributed to Jean Frosne. The texture and level of detail, especially the shading, are fantastic. Editor: Immediately, I’m struck by the contrast. We see an image trying to portray the power of monarchy, but the details tell a different story. Clovis’ gaze is almost…vacant? Curator: That's perceptive. Clovis III was one of the so-called "do-nothing kings". What the image conveys to me is an effort to create authority in a period where royal power was largely symbolic. Note the symbolism present; for example, observe his crown or his regal garb, elements carefully chosen for conveying power and nobility. It shows the cultural continuity and lasting impression of royal icons, regardless of their actual significance. Editor: Precisely, that historical context is essential. The symbols are almost a mask. Frosne uses conventions, yes, but within an historical frame where Clovis’ real agency was contested. The detailed craftsmanship almost works against it, emphasizing a void where genuine power should reside. What interests me is that the print, due to its medium and relative ease of dissemination, would engage a broader public and arguably invite critique. Curator: An interesting consideration. And to take it even further, note that this piece evokes the psychological aspect of power and authority, suggesting a yearning for the return of the once great empire of the Franks, despite the hollowness it attempts to conceal through the royal signifiers displayed for public view. Editor: Right. It makes one wonder, who did these portraits truly serve? The depicted king? The power structure trying to legitimize itself? Or us, centuries later, still debating what symbols truly mean? Curator: I agree, an artistic interpretation like this makes the viewing experience engaging and opens the piece up for continuous debate. Editor: Absolutely, that’s where its lasting impact truly resides.

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.