Portret van Natalis Eudes de l'Arche 1673 - 1744

This is Reynier Blokhuysen's portrait of Natalis Eudes de l'Arche, made with etching. During the 17th and 18th centuries, portraits functioned as a display of status and identity. De l’Arche’s identity as a Prothonotary Apostolic is emphasized through the fine details of his formal attire and the book he holds, perhaps a symbol of knowledge and authority. Meanwhile, Blokhuysen’s identity as the artist is more subtle. Consider the emotional tenor of this piece. The formality of the portrait provides a glimpse into the rigid societal structures of the time, particularly within the church. Does this formal depiction provide insight into the power dynamics of the period? How might it reflect or challenge societal expectations?