Ziekte van kardinaal Richelieu 1643

Editor: Here we have a bronze medal from 1643 called "Ziekte van kardinaal Richelieu," or "Cardinal Richelieu's Illness" in English. One side shows a profile of the cardinal, the other shows a lion with some other animals I can’t quite make out. It looks quite weighty and serious. What can you tell me about this piece? Curator: This medal offers a fascinating glimpse into the political narratives of the time. Notice how Richelieu, despite being ill, is presented in profile, a visual nod to classical rulers and power. But it’s the reverse side that really speaks to me. Editor: The lion and the other animals? Curator: Exactly. The lion is traditionally seen to represent France, but here, weakened and possibly besieged by the smaller animals, it suggests the fragility of the French state during Richelieu’s illness. The inscription reinforces this reading, suggesting the potency and potential threats posed by enemies. Consider the historical context – the medal was created during the Thirty Years' War. Do you think this adds another layer to the symbolism? Editor: That makes sense! The Thirty Years' War was definitely a tumultuous time for France. I hadn't thought about it as a statement on the war, just about Richelieu himself. Curator: Exactly! Medals like these were often commissioned to project specific messages, shaping public perception and reinforcing the power dynamics of the era. Understanding its intended audience and function reveals the complex relationship between art, power, and politics. It's about deconstructing visual symbols within historical contexts, questioning dominant narratives, and appreciating the medal's contribution to collective memory. Editor: I see what you mean, it definitely changes how I see the artwork. Thank you for this new perspective on history, and the function that art plays! Curator: My pleasure! Keep questioning those narratives!