Opvoeding van Jupiter 1818 - 1863

Editor: So, here we have "The Education of Jupiter" from the mid-19th century, an engraving by Carel Christiaan Antony Last. It feels like a pretty conventional historical scene, almost…sanitized, in its presentation of mythology. What strikes you about this print? Curator: What I find compelling is how this idealized, almost sentimental, depiction of Jupiter's infancy actually serves to reinforce very specific societal power structures. We have this image of nurturing and innocence, set against a carefully constructed, classical landscape. But, let’s think about whose stories are being told, and how? Editor: That’s interesting. I guess I was just seeing it at face value. Curator: Right, but consider: we have a classical subject, which, through history, always implies privilege, education, and the established order. Now, notice that Jupiter is suckled by a woman here. Given that this is an engraving, how do you interpret its significance considering gender roles and visibility in the art world at that time? Editor: Hmmm...it feels like the artist wants us to focus on a very domestic interpretation of power, where a powerful man comes to life thanks to female nourishment and care? Curator: Exactly. And this focus on domesticity, on the supposed 'natural' roles, actively excludes other voices and experiences, wouldn’t you agree? This piece doesn’t just depict a scene; it perpetuates an ideal and a narrative, reinforcing what was deemed acceptable and important. It omits or actively silences any perspectives outside that narrow band. Editor: I hadn't thought about it that way at all. It makes me consider what other stories are being omitted to focus on Jupiter’s…early life. Curator: It also points out how visual art may offer very interesting insights when analysed with the right approach. It offers visual information on the period of time. Editor: Thanks. That's given me a lot to think about!