Document by commandant "Prins Hendrik Garde"

Document Possibly 1910 - 1915

0:00
0:00

drawing, paper, ink

# 

portrait

# 

drawing

# 

homemade paper

# 

paper non-digital material

# 

hand drawn type

# 

paper

# 

personal sketchbook

# 

ink

# 

fading type

# 

history-painting

Dimensions: height 33.8 cm, width 20.9 cm

Copyright: Rijks Museum: Open Domain

Editor: This is "Document," possibly created between 1910 and 1915, and the artist is Commandant "Prins Hendrik Garde". It’s ink on paper, resembling a handwritten letter or maybe a draft. The faded blue ink gives it an aged and somewhat personal quality. What catches your eye in terms of the materiality or the production of this "document"? Curator: I'm drawn to the paper itself. Its texture, likely homemade or at least of low cost, tells a story about resourcefulness and the potential social standing of the author. Was this readily available, discarded, or intentionally selected? Also, note the ink; its fading suggests instability, perhaps a lack of archival foresight, which further informs us about the document's intended lifespan and, thus, its value to its creator. Editor: So you're suggesting the materials themselves communicate the intentions or social status of the Commandant? Curator: Precisely. Consider the labor involved. The deliberate act of handwriting, the time it would have taken to inscribe such a lengthy text, highlights the value the author placed on the content – whether it be for record-keeping, communication, or personal reflection. Do you notice any unique features within the handwriting itself? Editor: Now that you point it out, I see some flourishes, especially at the beginning of sentences, giving the document an ornate touch, juxtaposed with the common materials. Curator: An interesting point; it creates tension between the intention of the artist to address specific members of society, as suggested by this paper being used as a means of recording some moment in time. This combination offers interesting context and background, don't you agree? Editor: Absolutely. I hadn't considered how the materiality itself could provide such insights. It definitely encourages a closer examination of what would otherwise be viewed as just an old document. Thanks for opening my eyes to this layer of interpretation!

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.