Illustration of 'Les Diaboliques' 1879

Editor: We’re looking at Félicien Rops' 1879 engraving, "Illustration of 'Les Diaboliques'". It has this theatrical air, with a central figure draped in cloth and flanked by glowing sconces. It’s visually arresting, but I am unsure about the symbolism in play. How do you interpret this work through its formal components? Curator: Primarily, note how Rops employs line and tonal contrast to generate both depth and a certain atmospheric intensity. The figure is presented at the apex of a shallow recession, bracketed by sources of light, with particular attention paid to textures: stone, cloth, flesh. Can we determine through an assessment of the formal devices at work, what narrative impact that might hold? Editor: Well, the texture certainly emphasizes a tactile quality. I see the light focusing on the figure’s gesture with the draped fabric, adding drama, almost like a stage curtain. It calls attention to this character’s action and placement within a framed space, surrounded by symbols on the walls... coats of arms. How do they function here? Curator: Consider the geometry of composition; the arrayed shields function as both anchoring elements and a counterpoint to the curves of the figure. Light radiates from the sconces, creating a focal point but is equally a device which serves to highlight the subject as both material form and ethereal entity. How are we to balance these conflicting modes of expression? Editor: I see what you mean. The interplay of light and shadow isn't just for drama, it contributes to the subject's dual presence as both material and more spectral form. This reminds me how symbolism often juxtaposes opposing ideas to make meaning. Curator: Precisely. In observing Rops' studied use of the devices available, we see the birth of a compelling duality. That which appears real may be equally illusory; our senses are indeed open to deception. Editor: That makes perfect sense. Seeing it through the formal lens really brings the work’s thematic concerns to life. I hadn’t picked up on that so explicitly.