Bleu de ciel 1940

Editor: Here we have Wassily Kandinsky's "Bleu de ciel," created in 1940 using watercolor. There’s a certain lightness to it, a playful scattering of shapes across this dreamy blue background. What do you see in this piece, particularly considering its historical context? Curator: The 'dreamy' quality you mention is quite striking, especially when considering that this was painted during World War II. Kandinsky, as a member of the avant-garde, was acutely aware of the sociopolitical landscape. His move towards more biomorphic, almost whimsical forms can be viewed as a form of resistance. How might we interpret these floating shapes against the backdrop of such turmoil? Editor: Resistance through abstraction, interesting. I guess I hadn’t considered that the lightness might be a deliberate counterpoint to the heaviness of the war. So, you are saying it is social commentary? Curator: I'd argue it moves beyond simple commentary. Kandinsky, having witnessed the rise of totalitarianism and experiencing firsthand the suppression of avant-garde art, encodes a language of freedom within these forms. Think about the use of color: Does the interplay of hues and shapes feel harmonious, or perhaps even defiant? Consider its departure from early work, too. Editor: I see it. The colors aren't aggressive; they’re more hopeful. I hadn't really considered that abstract art could be a response to war in that way. It makes me wonder about other abstract artists from that period. Curator: Exactly! This work is deeply entwined with its time. Looking at the period as a whole is essential for any comprehensive grasp of how individual expression fits into the sociohistorical circumstances of its day. This is only the start of exploring expression during historical moments, though. Editor: Definitely given me a new lens for viewing art, especially abstract work, I didn’t quite understand before.