1850s - 1860s
Ichnographs from the Sandstone of Connecticut River
Listen to curator's interpretation
Curatorial notes
Curator: Before us we have, from the 1850s to 1860s, James Deane’s, “Ichnographs from the Sandstone of Connecticut River.” It's currently held at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. What's your initial read of the work? Editor: Immediately, there’s an incredible sense of muted stillness, an almost monochromatic study. The textural qualities seem emphasized by this limited tonal range, bringing out an eerie sense of ancient record-keeping. Curator: Deane’s methodology clearly prioritizes direct observation. Note the use of mixed media and watercolor, lending itself to the creation of texture but retaining a certain incompleteness. This evokes the inherent challenges in capturing geological specimens accurately, a very intriguing aesthetic choice. Editor: Absolutely, this sense of incompleteness contributes to its symbolic impact. Those lines of tiny repetitive impressions whisper a story of tiny lives passed. Given the title and what we know of sandstone, is there a connection to animal tracks here? Curator: Precisely. This series studies fossilized tracks, immortalizing brief encounters. Notice, however, how each section varies; the subtle shifts in value emphasize certain textural elements while concealing others. Observe especially Figure 1 with the regular chain. Editor: Fascinating. To the modern eye, these repeated forms elicit primal associations – the steady march, the inexorable passage of epochs. Even without a clear image, each individual mark communicates time’s transformative power. The composition in general conveys an underlying feeling of being minuscule on this large scale. Curator: The interplay between macro and micro is what keeps our eyes engaged with this specimen documentation. Though executed in media readily available to Deane, he gives equal weighting to capturing an overview of fossil structures as much as he does to depicting a fossil's fine ridges. Editor: These muted tones make one wonder about Deane’s understanding of transience. Through iconography, aren’t they urging reflection not only about an imbedded visual symbol but on the layers of the symbol's meaning? It makes me consider permanence versus temporal meaning. Curator: Your insights into this work's symbolic power opens new pathways for comprehending Deane’s project! From the standpoint of art criticism, looking deeply at his compositions helps to grasp the value and challenges intrinsic to works that reside outside the standard category definitions.