J. D. Zepelin 1833

Editor: Here we have Edvard Lehmann’s 1833 lithograph, "J. D. Zepelin.” It strikes me as such a formal, almost severe portrait. What stands out to you? Curator: Beyond the surface-level formality, consider the subject’s position in society and the power dynamics at play. This portrait exists because of Zepelin’s rank. How does his attire contribute to or perhaps even construct his identity, and how might this reflect broader social inequalities? Editor: So, the very act of creating and displaying this portrait reinforces a social hierarchy? Curator: Precisely. Think about access. Who has the privilege of having their image immortalized and disseminated? And who is excluded from this visual representation? Also, examine the symbols of power – the uniform, the medals. What do these objects signify, and what ideologies do they uphold? Editor: They definitely seem to scream "authority”. Are there other portraits from the time that challenge this established narrative? Curator: Absolutely! It’s crucial to examine these portraits alongside images of marginalized groups, or even portraits that subtly critique power. Comparing and contrasting them provides a more comprehensive understanding of the era and its power struggles. What does this portrait leave out? Editor: That's a great point, it’s very one-sided. It shows who held the power but obscures the experiences of those who didn’t. Thinking about it, art can unconsciously become a means of validating or challenging the societal status. Curator: Exactly! Engaging with art through this lens helps us become more critically aware of the narratives being presented and whose voices are being amplified or silenced. Editor: I’ll definitely look at the surrounding socio-political context going forward. Thanks, this was incredibly helpful in widening my perspective on portraiture!