Still Life with Thistle and Snake 1663

Observers must exercise their imagination in order to understand the artistic and aesthetic mode of expression that the Dutch artist Otto Marseus van Schrieck painted into his peculiar paintings, for what remains today is merely a torso. Time has been unkind to van Schrieck’s paintings. Still Life with Thistle and Snake, signed and dated ”OTTO. Marseus 1663”, is no exception. Originally, the picture, especially the butterflies, would have shone brightly with its myriad colours. All that is left now is a limited palette of mossy greens, ochre yellows, and bluish greens and a meek, unassuming red used for the cyclamen and daisies in the forest floor. With this work Otto Marseus van Schrieck created a special type of painting because he “stole” wings from real-life butterflies and because of his skill at imitating the special structures found in the forest’s soft covering of mosses and lichen. Even though the butterfly dust and glorious colours are now gone, the work remains intact as a narrative. The artist’s ability to introduce a dramatic story is as evident today as when the work was made. The drama in the foreground is about the battle between good and evil; an ever-recurring topos in art. Within a second the snake will devour the butterfly. The story seems realistic, partly because details such as the snake’s windpipe have been carefully painted into its gaping maw. Nevertheless, the scene is an impossible one. Snakes have never included butterflies among their prey. With its “loans” from nature the painting is poised between natural science and art. Indeed, van Schrieck’s painting provides a scene for the merging of nature and art. Such hybrid forms were greatly treasured within the era’s encyclopaedic cabinets and cabinets of natural curiosities. One of the tropes of the Kunstkammer/cabinet concept was ”playful nature”; it was believed that nature could create images and beings on a whim (for example in the structure of a marble stone). Nature could play and art could create natural sceneries such as those found in van Schrieck’s painting. At the time, similar sensibilities were expressed by Kunstkammer exhibits that combined natural objects with an artisan’s craftsmanship in equal measure. Otto Marseus van Schrieck’s paintings were popular collector’s items, not least because they made excellent “conversation pieces”. When the collector showed his guests his cabinet of curiosities van Schrieck’s approach offered a chance to present an entertaining anecdote, and, importantly, the scenes depicted provided a moral lesson for the observers’ edification.