Antoninianus of Probus? c. 3th century

Curator: Here we have an intriguing artifact, an Antoninianus possibly of Probus, residing here at the Harvard Art Museums. Its patinated surface intrigues me—a testament to its age. Editor: It looks so small, and worn. I wonder whose hands held it, what power it represented and for whom? Curator: Indeed, the images and inscriptions act as signifiers. The coin served as propaganda, circulating the emperor's image and his virtues throughout the Roman Empire. Editor: And what of the people who likely never saw the emperor himself? This coin would be their only connection, shaped by imperial messaging, of course. Curator: The composition is quite standard for its time. The head of the Emperor, the reverse depicting a Roman deity. It's a study in efficient communication. Editor: I find myself considering the economic disparity it highlights, the lived reality of Roman citizens versus the idealized images propagated. Curator: A poignant thought. Through careful semiotic analysis and historical contextualization, we gain a richer understanding. Editor: Absolutely, it's a compelling object that bridges art history and social commentary, encouraging critical engagement.