1765
Medaillon met het portret van Stanisław August Poniatowski, gedragen door een adelaar
Listen to curator's interpretation
Curatorial notes
Curator: Here we have an engraving from 1765 by Antoine de Marcenay de Ghuy titled, "Medaillon met het portret van Stanisław August Poniatowski, gedragen door een adelaar" – or, “Medallion with the portrait of Stanisław August Poniatowski, carried by an eagle.” Editor: Immediately, I'm struck by the weight of symbolism – it’s trying very hard to convince me of something, isn’t it? All that turbulent cloud-etching swirling around the rather unflappable portrait… feels almost theatrical. Curator: Absolutely. The Baroque period was all about spectacle, and even in a print like this, meant for wider circulation, the presentation is carefully constructed to project power. The means of production are interesting here. Engravings, like this one on laid paper, were a primary way to disseminate imagery and reinforce authority. Editor: It makes you think about accessibility. Like, who was really seeing this, beyond the royal court or the elite? And what did they make of all the fuss? Because the eagle feels almost desperate to elevate Poniatowski…is it working too hard? Curator: That tension between subject and symbolism may be key. We need to consider the material conditions under which prints were made and consumed at the time. This image helped craft and spread an idea of Polish kingship linked to both divinity and a powerful European aesthetic. Editor: You're right, and yet, all I can think about is the artist hunched over the engraving plate, meticulously recreating a fiction. Think about the physical act of transforming metal and paper to embody regal splendor, its a translation, its a dance, almost intimate, wouldn’t you agree? Curator: Intimate in the sense that labour leaves its mark, yes. The consumption of these kinds of prints had political consequences in shaping how people regarded the king and perceived the power structure in society. Editor: Precisely. Looking at it this way brings the work to life again; far beyond mere propaganda. The print reveals something honest in all that effort— the longing for lasting impact. Curator: Yes, it pushes past the limits of our immediate perspective, linking labor, class and historical record in an engaging material culture. Editor: For me it embodies the struggle to eternalize something fleeting through tangible labor and enduring form. Thank you for illuminating all those production-era processes that give that fleeting portrait, an intriguing sense of permanence.