Triumph of Fame c. 18th century

Editor: Here we have Silvio Pomarede's "Triumph of Fame," housed at the Harvard Art Museums. It's an engraving, a process that allows for such intricate detail. There's almost a mechanical feel to the precise lines. What does this focus on reproductive technique say about its value, or intended audience? Curator: Think about the division of labor inherent in printmaking. Pomarede likely designed it, but other artisans would have been involved in the actual engraving and printing. The value shifts from unique artistic creation to widespread accessibility and distribution of imagery. Consider also how the printing press democratized knowledge. How does this impact ideas about fame? Editor: So, the medium itself challenges the idea of singular genius? The artwork’s value isn't just in the image but also in its production and circulation? Curator: Precisely. It highlights how fame isn't solely about individual achievement, but is a product of collective effort and societal structures. The means of production shape the message. Editor: I never considered how the physical process connects to the theme so directly. Thanks for that! Curator: My pleasure. It's all about seeing the bigger picture, and the material conditions that create it.