About this artwork
This octagonal bowl, of unknown origin, features floral motifs, dragons, and pearls. The bowl's structure immediately grabs our attention: its eight-sided form is unusual. This deviates from the traditional roundness often associated with bowls, suggesting a deliberate choice to challenge convention. The floral motifs, dragons, and pearls are not merely decorative; they act as signifiers within a cultural code. Dragons, for example, often represent power and good fortune, while pearls may symbolize purity or wisdom. The arrangement of these motifs, combined with the bowl's octagonal shape, creates a visual language that invites us to decode its message. Consider how the interplay of form and symbol destabilizes our expectations. Is it a functional object? A purely symbolic one? Perhaps it is an intersection, inviting ongoing interpretation rather than fixed meaning.
Octagonal bowl with floral motifs, dragons and pearls
c. 1670 - 1700
Anonymous
@anonymousLocation
RijksmuseumArtwork details
- Medium
- ceramic, earthenware
- Dimensions
- height 7.9 cm, diameter 12.1 cm, diameter 5.6 cm
- Location
- Rijksmuseum
- Copyright
- Rijks Museum: Open Domain
Tags
baroque
asian-art
ceramic
earthenware
decorative-art
Comments
Be the first to share your thoughts about this work.
About this artwork
This octagonal bowl, of unknown origin, features floral motifs, dragons, and pearls. The bowl's structure immediately grabs our attention: its eight-sided form is unusual. This deviates from the traditional roundness often associated with bowls, suggesting a deliberate choice to challenge convention. The floral motifs, dragons, and pearls are not merely decorative; they act as signifiers within a cultural code. Dragons, for example, often represent power and good fortune, while pearls may symbolize purity or wisdom. The arrangement of these motifs, combined with the bowl's octagonal shape, creates a visual language that invites us to decode its message. Consider how the interplay of form and symbol destabilizes our expectations. Is it a functional object? A purely symbolic one? Perhaps it is an intersection, inviting ongoing interpretation rather than fixed meaning.
Comments
Be the first to share your thoughts about this work.