Immortal Poet 17th century

Editor: Here we have "Immortal Poet," created in the 17th century by Kano Shōdun. It's a drawing using ink, and it has such a gentle and calm feel. How do you interpret this work? Curator: Well, if we focus on the materials, the pen and ink drawing, what does that signify about its creation? Its reproducibility for one. This wasn't a singular, monumental sculpture destined for a palace. It suggests a system of production, maybe even for a wider audience. Note the colored pencil, too. Does that inclusion complicate notions of "high" art versus more decorative or even commercial forms? Editor: That's a good point. So the materials chosen hint at the societal context in which it was created, influencing who got to enjoy the art? Curator: Precisely! Ink drawings were relatively accessible, influencing broader artistic participation. Think of the paper itself—it is humble. Consider its cost and availability compared to silk or imported pigments. This makes the “immortal poet” accessible, even demystified, removing him from some untouchable realm. We also have to remember the context for "immortality". Was the "immortality" intended in a literal, religious sense, or as an allusion to everlasting impact and presence achieved through literary production? Editor: Interesting! It makes you wonder about the intention behind making someone so prestigious…well, almost commonplace, doesn't it? Curator: Indeed. Perhaps we are to appreciate this figure's place in broader society via everyday items and techniques. Considering materiality allows us to ground the work in its socio-economic moment, pushing back against romantic ideas of singular genius. Editor: That gives me a lot to think about regarding how we value the artist and his materials. Thank you. Curator: My pleasure. Reflecting on material context helps question ingrained notions.