Moneyman No. 2 1983

Curator: Colin Self’s *Moneyman No. 2* is quite striking, isn't it? The superimposition of abstract forms on what appears to be British currency creates a rather unsettling effect. What do you make of this piece? Editor: It’s definitely unconventional! The use of money as a backdrop feels like it's making a statement, but I'm unsure what that is. Is it a critique of capitalism or something else entirely? Curator: Precisely! Self came of age during a period of intense social and political change. Money, particularly in the form of currency featuring the Queen, becomes both a symbol of national identity and a potential target for critique. Do you think the abstract forms soften or intensify that critique? Editor: I think they intensify it, making the message more cryptic and thought-provoking. What I mean is, it feels like Self is asking us to look beyond the surface value of money. Curator: I agree. Self challenges us to consider the complex relationship between money, power, and identity in post-war Britain. Editor: It's amazing how much historical context influences the reading of a work. Thanks! Curator: My pleasure. It highlights art's role in reflecting and shaping societal dialogues.