Willem V, prins van Oranje-Nassau, draagteken vervaardigd uit Overijsselse duit 1766 - 1787

Editor: Here we have "Willem V, prins van Oranje-Nassau, draagteken vervaardigd uit Overijsselse duit" by Nicolaas Wonneman, dated between 1766 and 1787. It's a small, engraved metal token, a bit worn, with lettering on both sides. What stands out to me is how the act of engraving itself transforms an everyday object, like a coin, into a personal and perhaps political statement. What do you see in this piece? Curator: This small object speaks volumes about power, loyalty, and the subtle resistance that can emerge from everyday life. A coin, typically a symbol of state authority and economic control, has been repurposed, almost subverted. By engraving it with dedications to Willem V, it transforms from a simple currency into a wearable emblem of support, likely during a time of political tension or upheaval. It’s fascinating to consider who made it and wore it. Editor: So, it's like a DIY political badge? Curator: Exactly. And it highlights how ordinary people can engage with, or perhaps subtly challenge, the dominant power structures. Think about the personal risk involved in creating and displaying such a token, especially if Willem V wasn't universally supported. The choice of metal itself - seemingly humble - might suggest a commentary on wealth and power. Consider also the act of wearing it. Who wore it? What did it mean to them to wear their loyalty so publicly? Editor: I never thought of it as an act of resistance. I was focused on the craftsmanship. Curator: The craftsmanship is important, but it’s inseparable from the piece’s context. This piece invites us to consider how marginalized individuals have historically used accessible materials to express complex political sentiments and declare their affiliations. Editor: I see it now. The coin becomes a miniature protest sign, almost. I’ll never look at historical objects the same way.