Portret van Johann Heinrich Jung-Stilling 1801

Editor: So, this is a portrait of Johann Heinrich Jung-Stilling, made in 1801 by Franz Hegi. It’s an engraving, which gives it a sort of delicate, precise quality. I find it really interesting how the artist captured such a serious, almost austere expression. What catches your eye in this piece? Curator: What an elegant example of Neoclassical portraiture! The crisp lines of the engraving are almost like a sculptor’s chisel at work, wouldn't you agree? Look at how Hegi renders Jung-Stilling in profile, reminiscent of ancient Roman busts. And did you know Jung-Stilling was a prominent author and physician at the time? The choice to depict him in this classical, almost timeless way feels…intentional, wouldn't you say? Editor: Absolutely, it does give him an air of importance, of intellectual weight. Do you think that connects to Neoclassicism? I mean, was it always about presenting people as these kind of stoic, idealized figures? Curator: Exactly! Neoclassicism turned to antiquity for its ideals. A championing of reason, order, and civic virtue. So portraying Jung-Stilling this way wasn't just about likeness, it was about aligning him with those values. I wonder if the public back then immediately grasped those connections. What do you reckon? Editor: I suppose they were more attuned to those visual cues than we are now. It’s like the artist is making a statement, not just recording a face. It does make me see beyond the surface of the portrait. Thank you, that’s helpful. Curator: My pleasure. Thinking about art as communication - a visual conversation across time - isn't that really why we're here? And besides, who doesn’t love a good historical echo?