Plate c. late 18th century

Editor: Here we have a plate dating back to the late 18th century. It's anonymous, so we don't know who made it, but it is composed of ceramic and metal. It feels very utilitarian to me. What strikes you about this piece? Curator: Well, let's start with the obvious: it’s not just ‘made of’ ceramic and metal, but how those materials were chosen, worked, and ultimately consumed. Someone, or many people, extracted those materials from the earth. Who were they? What were their conditions? And then, this object implies a different sort of labor; someone with specific skills and tools carefully shaped this object. Don’t you think that tells us more than just "utilitarian"? Editor: I hadn't considered all that labor! I guess seeing it here, displayed as art, separates it from the reality of its creation. Curator: Exactly! It speaks volumes about consumption patterns of the time, and how even the seemingly mundane reflects systems of production, labor, and trade. Think about the form too. A simple, elegant shape suggesting accessibility and a certain level of social distinction at the time. Who owned it, and how did its material qualities shape their experiences of dining and social gatherings? Editor: That makes me think about how mass production changed things later on. You lose that connection to the makers when it's all automated. Curator: Precisely. This object, even in its simplicity, offers us a tangible link to the processes and social relationships that underpinned its creation and use. Considering the broader social and economic picture transforms our perception of a simple plate, wouldn't you agree? Editor: I absolutely agree. I'll never look at everyday objects the same way again! It's fascinating to consider the hidden layers within something so seemingly simple.