Gipsmodel voor een gewelfversiering van het Pavillon Richelieu in het Palais du Louvre by Edouard Baldus

Gipsmodel voor een gewelfversiering van het Pavillon Richelieu in het Palais du Louvre c. 1855 - 1857

0:00
0:00

print, photography

# 

neoclacissism

# 

print

# 

photography

# 

decorative-art

Dimensions: height 376 mm, width 523 mm

Copyright: Rijks Museum: Open Domain

Editor: This is a photograph by Edouard Baldus, taken around 1855-1857, of a plaster model for a vault decoration in the Louvre's Richelieu Pavilion. I'm struck by how this image preserves a fragment of grand architecture; it almost feels like holding a lost piece of history. What can you tell me about this piece and the historical context surrounding it? Curator: This photograph speaks volumes about 19th-century France and its complex relationship with power, representation, and historical narratives. Baldus’s photograph doesn’t merely document a decorative element, but highlights how architecture and its ornamentation became tools for constructing national identity and legitimizing imperial ambitions during the Second Empire. Editor: How so? Curator: Think about it: the Louvre, a former royal palace, was being transformed into a public museum – a space for the people, yet still radiating an aura of power. The Richelieu Pavilion, with its elaborate Neoclassical decorations, was part of this larger project of shaping a particular image of France – one that drew on classical ideals of beauty and order, while simultaneously asserting France's dominance on the world stage. Photography, as a relatively new medium, played a crucial role in disseminating this image. Baldus was commissioned to document these projects, his images then became part of a larger propaganda machine that reinforced prevailing ideologies. The photograph also reinforces the relationship between art and power: it reminds us that seemingly neutral representations can be deeply implicated in systems of social and political control. Editor: That’s fascinating! So even a picture of decorative art can reveal these larger power structures at play? Curator: Exactly. It invites us to consider the relationship between aesthetics and politics, between art and ideology. The photo’s meticulous detail serves a political purpose and aesthetic end. What do you think that purpose was? Editor: I hadn't considered how intertwined art, power, and national identity could be. It changes how I see not only this photograph but the whole role of photography. Thanks.

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.