Portret van Johann Benedict Carpzov 1699 - 1733

Curator: This print depicts Johann Benedict Carpzov, engraved sometime between 1699 and 1733, a portrait by Martin Bernigeroth. It’s currently held in the Rijksmuseum. What strikes you about it? Editor: The incredible detail, especially in the ruff! It gives a real sense of the period and the sitter's status, I think. It's also very formal and...unforgiving almost. How should we interpret images like this now? Curator: Consider the function of such portraits within the socio-political landscape of the time. This image served to publicly affirm Carpzov’s authority and standing within his theological and academic circles. Note the inscription surrounding him—it meticulously lists his titles, a clear indicator of his power. How do you think that impacts our reading of the piece? Editor: So, it’s less about individual likeness and more about representing his role, solidifying his institutional position...it feels like propaganda, but perhaps with a softer intention? Curator: Indeed! "Propaganda" might be too harsh, but it underscores the constructed nature of public image. Ask yourself: What aspects of Carpzov’s humanity might have been intentionally omitted to create this powerful and unshakeable impression? And what institutions are at work to produce and share this image? Editor: It really makes me think about who controls the narrative, even in something as seemingly straightforward as a portrait. I guess I initially underestimated the work of maintaining institutional power. Curator: Exactly. It is a reminder of the intersection between art and the ever-shifting currents of political life.