Spur 1935 - 1942

Editor: Here we have William Kieckhofel's "Spur," a watercolor and drawing made between 1935 and 1942. The detailed rendering makes it seem almost photographic, yet something about its stark presentation feels quite modern. What strikes you about this particular work? Curator: Immediately, the formal arrangement commands attention. The artist has meticulously depicted a singular object against a vast, empty plane. Consider the line work: precise and controlled, delineating the complex forms of the spur. Notice also how Kieckhofel deployed color--restrained, realistic, focusing the eye on the interplay of textures and materials. How does this choice impact your reading? Editor: I think the muted palette forces you to really look at the shape and construction of the object itself. There is such an intricacy within it. What do you make of its visual texture, especially regarding the contrasting matte and shiny bits? Curator: Precisely! The interplay of matte surfaces—the leather, for instance—against the sheen of the metal components is paramount. Kieckhofel has exploited the properties of watercolor to achieve a convincing illusion of dimensionality. What kind of symbolic impact might this have on our perception? Is there some hidden meaning that you detect by observing these features? Editor: Well, it makes the spur seem almost…precious. Elevated. But also functional because its materials have purpose. So is that it? Was Kieckhofel just keen on spurs? Curator: A pertinent question. While a full reckoning with authorial intent eludes us, the emphasis on line, form, and texture points towards an artist deeply engaged with the inherent visual properties of his subject. Whether intended as mere recording or elevated, thoughtful composition, one thing is certain - Kieckhofel was intrigued. I learned from our viewing to value material more, thanks! Editor: Me too! Looking at the piece more closely using those parameters offers an all-new vision, beyond my immediate impression.