Two Self-Portraits in Profile by George Cruikshank

Two Self-Portraits in Profile n.d.

0:00
0:00

drawing, print, paper, pencil, graphite

# 

portrait

# 

drawing

# 

self-portrait

# 

print

# 

pen sketch

# 

paper

# 

pencil

# 

line

# 

graphite

Dimensions: 115 × 181 mm

Copyright: Public Domain

Curator: Here we have George Cruikshank’s “Two Self-Portraits in Profile,” an intriguing drawing residing at the Art Institute of Chicago. What strikes you most when you look at this, Editor? Editor: A certain ghostly quality, I think. Two versions of the same man, yet drawn with varying degrees of confidence or perhaps intimacy. The left is sparse, almost like an annotation; the right, more developed. It's about unveiling, but also concealing aspects of selfhood. Curator: Precisely. Look at the divergent detail in the facial hair, for example, or lack thereof. The drawing itself is composed of graphite, pencil and ink on paper, which gives the work a sketchy, immediate feel, perfect for this kind of self-inquiry. It feels almost like he’s feeling out his identity on the page. Editor: Identity formation, performance of self, but for whom? We see these sketches within a very specific context. This artist, during this historical moment—consider the power dynamics embedded in visual representation, in deciding *who* gets to represent themselves, *how*, and for *what* audience. Was this destined for public display or private reflection? Curator: Ah, the eternal question with self-portraits! The contrast in style suggests that for one self the intent was very different than it was for the other. I am drawn, perhaps like Cruikshank himself, to the more realised, and thus public facing, image on the right. Editor: Agreed. I mean, the act of choosing a profile is so revealing. It's a deliberate act of self-construction. Think of phrenology at the time – were profiles meant to invite a pseudoscientific 'reading' of his character? And we're still here, centuries later, 'reading' this image. Curator: Right, and as he became known for his caricatures, he made many portrait prints, the profile lends itself to satire and distinct characterization, though I see here only a rather refined if fleeting expression. Editor: Yes, so fleeting in its composition, yet layered with these larger conversations of representation. I am walking away pondering how this delicate work carries echoes of critical issues, which ripple into today's understanding of self and society. Curator: For me, it’s a tender glimpse behind the curtain, where an artist wrestles not just with their appearance, but their persona. Wonderful.

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.