Arghezi 

Editor: We're looking at "Arghezi" by Constantin Piliuta, a watercolor and ink drawing that feels both intimate and a bit…satirical? The subject's stern expression contrasted with the somewhat cartoonish rendering creates a really intriguing tension. What strikes you when you look at this work? Curator: You've hit on something important – that tension. To me, it's as if Piliuta is capturing a glimpse of the soul behind a public persona. The loose, almost frantic lines suggest a restless energy, fighting against the rigid formality of the pose and the period. I almost get the sense that Piliuta knows Arghezi and likes him, and knows he has that deep set sternness. But maybe a tenderness. Do you think that is just me projecting a fantasy narrative? Editor: Maybe, but I see what you mean. There's a vulnerability there, despite the mustache and the imposing vest. The watercolor washes soften the harshness of the ink lines, giving the whole piece a human touch. It almost feels unfinished, or fleeting, doesn’t it? Curator: Exactly! It's like a fleeting impression, a memory recalled imperfectly. I imagine Piliuta furiously trying to capture this mans likeness! Notice how the details fade away towards the edges, focusing our attention on the face and the tightly clasped hands, maybe this artist wanted you to think he was only looking at Arghezi. What could it mean when one clasps their hands tightly together like that? I would venture a guess, I have so many myself! Editor: Good point. I hadn't really considered the hands before. They do seem important. I had initially misread it as "just" a portrait. Curator: It's easy to do. But isn't it wonderful how a closer look, and a bit of shared observation, can unlock so much more? This little study reminds me to look a little bit closer next time.