Dimensions: image: 297 x 211 mm support: 297 x 211 mm frame: 365 x 278 x 38 mm
Copyright: © David Shrigley | CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED, Photo: Tate
Curator: I find this "Untitled" drawing by David Shrigley so compelling. The Tate holds it in their collection, and it's essentially a handwritten, repeated phrase on lined paper. Editor: It feels like a mantra gone slightly wrong, doesn't it? The repetition of "Santa Claus is not evil. There is no need to defend myself against him"… it's darkly humorous but also a bit unsettling. Curator: Exactly! Shrigley’s work often plays with the absurd and the mundane. Here, the childlike handwriting and the absurd statement create a tension. Is it paranoia? A genuine belief? Editor: Perhaps it reflects a broader anxiety about authority figures, even the seemingly benevolent ones we encounter in childhood. It makes you consider how cultural narratives are formed and questioned. Curator: I agree. And it's interesting how the simplicity of the piece—the paper, the pen, the repetition—amplifies the impact of the message. It's almost like a school punishment, writing lines over and over. Editor: It’s stuck in my head now… I think I’ll be side-eyeing Santa a bit more this year.
Join millions of artists and users on Artera today and experience the ultimate creative platform.
This Untitled work is composed of text, written by hand in capital letters on a piece of A4 lined paper torn from a pad. The text comprises two sentences written over two lines and repeated seventeen times so that it fills the page. It reads: ‘Santa Claus is not evil. There is no need to defend myself against him’. The repetition of the lines has a double character. It recalls the old fashioned practice of punishing school children by setting them the task of ‘doing lines’ – writing the same line of text over and over again a large number of times to drive its message home in the unfortunate pupil’s head. The ruled lines on the page – characteristic of school books – emphasise this. But instead of affirming that the author should not do something viewed by school teachers as transgressive and anti-social (as ‘lines’ normally do), Shrigley’s text would appear to testify to a neurosis. Evoking a fictional personality (the author) so troubled by his fear of a parental fantasy figure (Santa Claus) that he has to write lines to counter his delusion with reassurance, it suggests a mantra chanted with the purpose of self-healing. Whether the lines are a punishment by a fictional second party or a private personal ritual is entirely ambiguous. Either possible scenario combines comedy with pathos. The effect of a neurosis is heightened when it becomes apparent (it is not noticeable at a first glance) that the artist ruled pencil lines over the lines printed on the paper.