Tetradrachm of Alexandria under Elagabalus c. 220 - 221

Editor: This is a tetradrachm from Alexandria, dating back to the time of Elagabalus. The metal is heavily patinated, almost obscuring the design. How do we even begin to analyze something so worn? Curator: Precisely. The very degradation of the surface becomes part of its formal identity. Consider the bas-relief: despite the wear, the profiles retain a certain classical elegance. The play of light and shadow across the pitted surface creates an unexpected dynamism. Editor: So you're saying the damage is... intentional, almost? Curator: Not intentional, but integral. The coin's value now resides not just in its original design, but in the evidence of its material history. The abrasions and discolorations construct its own narrative, beyond its original purpose as currency. What do you make of the incuse triangle on the reverse? Editor: I'm not sure, but I see it now. Curator: Indeed, and it may well add to its formal properties. Considering the piece as a whole and how it relates to surface and the classical form intrigues me. Editor: I see how the surface texture interacts with the portraits to change how we view it. Thanks!