Landschap met de wapens van Ortt en Pergens (fragment ?) c. 1672 - 1700

Editor: This is an Anonymous weaving, likely from between 1672 and 1700, titled "Landscape with the coats of arms of Ortt and Pergens." It feels like a really grand gesture, a stately portrait but in textile form. What sort of symbolism were these landscapes used for? Curator: The coats of arms themselves are rich in symbolism, but the tapestry acts as a cultural signifier beyond that. Heraldry displayed in landscapes does more than denote familial pride. Look at how the lion, a traditional symbol of strength and courage, faces the fleur-de-lis, associated with French royalty and purity. What meaning might arise from their placement alongside each other? Editor: Maybe a union of some kind? Or perhaps the juxtaposition highlights a specific alliance or even a tension between the families? Curator: Precisely. And consider the landscape backdrop. It’s not just decorative; it evokes a sense of place, heritage, and dominion. Textiles, due to their cost and durability, also suggested lasting power. It speaks of a desire to root these symbols into the very fabric of the world, making the legacy literally woven into existence. Does this give you any thoughts regarding cultural memory? Editor: I guess it suggests a desire to make a mark, a kind of… immortalization through art, linking the families to the land, their values and even perhaps to each other? It also serves as a really practical tool, not easily discarded and readily seen on a daily basis, therefore more readily and consistently prompting those memories. Curator: Yes, the tapestry becomes a constant, visual reinforcement of the family's narrative, weaving their story into the collective memory through repeated viewing. That's the powerful role that images play in cultural history. Editor: It’s interesting to think about how an image, especially one as durable as a tapestry, could shape not just individual but collective identity over generations. Thanks for shining some light on that!