Portret van Marcus Wollaib 1646

Editor: So, here we have "Portret van Marcus Wollaib," an engraving from 1646 by Mättheus Rembold. The gentleman looks very serious. I am wondering about his robes, which remind me a bit of a legal setting. What do you see in this piece? Curator: I see an assertion of authority embedded in a period of religious and social upheaval. The portrait functions within the context of the Reformation and its aftermath, solidifying the image of the learned Protestant clergyman within a community increasingly fragmented by religious and political differences. Consider how Rembold used printmaking to disseminate Wollaib’s image – who was the audience? What was Rembold trying to achieve? Editor: It makes sense to present an image of stability and learning in that environment. You're right, printmaking makes it widely accessible. So was the intention for distribution amongst his local parishioners to reinforce his legitimacy? Curator: Precisely! Engravings allowed for wider circulation of these images. It’s a carefully constructed image. Consider his gaze, the book he holds – visual cues designed to project wisdom, piety, and scholarly authority. Notice too, the decorative border; even the lettering used has a formal, official quality. The choice of specific script styles wasn’t accidental. Editor: So it’s not just about showing what he looked like but also establishing a certain role, right? I hadn't thought about how much detail goes into creating that perception. Curator: Exactly. These portraits weren’t neutral records; they actively constructed and reinforced social hierarchies and power dynamics in their time. How do you see the museum's role in continuing or challenging these constructed identities today? Editor: Food for thought! I'll have to consider that! Thank you.