Apple tree 1905

Editor: This is Nicholas Roerich’s "Apple Tree" from 1905, done in watercolor. It has a rather muted, almost ghostly quality. What do you see in this piece? Curator: Well, the apple tree is deeply symbolic across many cultures. Think of Eden, knowledge, temptation…Roerich gives us a somewhat different feeling though, doesn't he? Look at how the delicate, almost frail branches reach outwards. Is this growth, or vulnerability? Editor: I guess I assumed growth. Curator: Consider the monochrome palette. What is traditionally associated with springtime bursting forth is rendered here with very little color and a light application. Is this the memory of a spring? The hope for one yet to come? Editor: Interesting. So, rather than a literal representation, he's hinting at deeper ideas through the symbol of the apple tree and its subdued appearance? Curator: Exactly! The tree, so laden with meaning, acts as a vessel for emotions and reflections about time and nature's cycles. Its monochrome aspect further underlines the weight and gravitas of a fading world, so common with artwork during Roerich’s time. Editor: I never would have considered the lack of color as symbolic! I was too focused on the image itself. It gives a lot more to think about. Curator: That's the beauty of diving into symbolism. The layers unfold, creating richer dialogues and prompting contemplation beyond the immediately visible. What we often see is just a first, albeit important, impression. Editor: I’ll definitely look closer at how artists use symbols from now on!