Andre de Wesembeke, thesaurier van de schatkist van Brussel 1621

Editor: Here we have "Andre de Wesembeke, thesaurier van de schatkist van Brussel," created in 1621 by an anonymous artist. It's a metal object, presumably a coin or medallion, and the images show both faces of the artwork. I'm struck by how damaged it appears. It looks like it’s been through a lot. What can you tell me about this piece? Curator: Considering the object's role, think about the societal values it represents. This coin embodies power and authority; currency in 17th-century Brussels played a pivotal role in shaping its economic and political landscape. The fact that it’s damaged makes one wonder—was this defacement intentional, perhaps symbolic of dissent? Editor: That's fascinating! So you're saying the damage could be more than just wear and tear; it might represent a form of political protest or some kind of social statement. The coat of arms is quite prominent. Would that also contribute to our understanding of its role? Curator: Precisely. Coats of arms are rarely neutral; they proclaim lineage and power, positioning individuals within the strict social hierarchies of the time. Who was Andre de Wesembeke, and what did it mean for him, and for Brussels society, to showcase that symbol? How did this visual language shape public perception? The wear is interesting; could this have circulated? Was its message intended for public consumption? Editor: I hadn't considered it that way. I suppose I was looking at it as just an old coin, but the historical context and potential socio-political messaging behind it are really eye-opening. Curator: Exactly. It shows how a seemingly simple object can be a powerful indicator of history. Every image is influenced by its historical background and its role in society. Editor: Thanks. Now I will think of coins in a very different way.