New York City 5 by Robert Frank

1960

New York City 5

Listen to curator's interpretation

0:00
0:00

Curatorial notes

Editor: This is "New York City 5" by Robert Frank, taken in 1960. It’s a black and white photograph showing a film strip. It has a disjointed, almost chaotic feel. What do you see in this piece, looking at it from your perspective? Curator: This image, with its film strip presentation, is fascinating when considering Frank’s broader critique of American society in the 1950s and 60s. The film strip format itself pushes against the notion of the decisive moment championed by earlier photographers. Instead, we see a sequence, implying duration, process, and maybe even the limitations of a singular viewpoint. Editor: So, it's about challenging traditional photography itself? Curator: Exactly. Think about the context. Frank was an outsider, a Swiss immigrant, documenting a society grappling with its own identity during a time of social upheaval. What narratives do you think Frank is trying to address through these sequences? Do you notice anything in the separate film stills that speak to a particular historical setting? Editor: Well, there seem to be images of ordinary people, cityscapes, some possibly in a park. They lack glamour; instead they present everyday life, unfiltered. The ordering implies some kind of intentional reading, though… I'm just not entirely sure how. Curator: And that "unfiltered" quality is key. The high contrast, the graininess – it all points to a rejection of the polished, idealized images prevalent at the time. Think about who gets to tell stories and how. Frank gives voice to the marginalized and questions the dominant narratives. He is creating counter-narratives by the way that he juxtaposes the selected stills on the film. The fragmented nature mirrors a society struggling with its own fractured identity, its unfulfilled promises. Editor: It's interesting how the form and content reinforce each other that way. It’s almost a collage in photographic format. Curator: Yes. So what I see is a deeply political piece masquerading as street photography. This really changes the impact and significance of a "simple photograph". Editor: I never would have looked at this photograph and considered the artist's outsider perspective and its social implications in the composition.