Brief aan Ary Johannes Lamme by Johannes Bosboom

Brief aan Ary Johannes Lamme Possibly 1840 - 1847

0:00
0:00

drawing, paper, ink, pen

# 

drawing

# 

paper

# 

ink

# 

pen work

# 

pen

# 

calligraphy

Copyright: Rijks Museum: Open Domain

Curator: What strikes me about Johannes Bosboom’s “Brief aan Ary Johannes Lamme,” possibly created between 1840 and 1847, is how a simple handwritten letter becomes an intimate portal to the past. Editor: Yes, initially the sheer volume of text makes it feel rather dense, almost imposing. But, thinking about it in terms of labor and intent... what does that density even mean? Curator: Considering it's ink on paper, Bosboom’s process of production would've been meticulous and time-consuming, right? Every stroke, every flourish, shows deliberate action, and he needed materials: pen, ink, paper and skills to produce and disseminate the information he wanted. Editor: Exactly. Letters in this period were so crucial in shaping social and political life, they were more than communication! The letter speaks about class, friendship and professional connections – all these layers existing on the paper. Curator: I am interested to consider how people in different positions approached something like a letter back then – especially the role gender must have played? A letter could also have a critical role, serving both personal needs and a link to collective needs of that time. Editor: You make a point. It’s impossible to ignore the potential hierarchies present, based on literacy, gender, or social standing. How does that affect who gets to voice, what gets written down, who gets access to it and for what reasons. It highlights power dynamics inherent in archival material, even within what might seem like a harmless correspondence between two people. Curator: Viewing art through that framework of exchange lets us grapple with a far bigger network than simply the writer. The calligraphy itself signals a crafted materiality—it isn't merely about the words but the artistry in delivering them. Editor: Yes! The pen work creates such a distinct texture and form, something digitized words and contemporary messaging lose—this really speaks to the human endeavor invested in it. Curator: It's almost like we are intruding on a very private moment; getting to see this preserved history. Editor: Which opens up further inquiries of art, reception and who gets to leave a mark on historical timeframes—the act of remembering, is, I suppose, more than the action alone.

Show more

Comments

No comments

Be the first to comment and join the conversation on the ultimate creative platform.