Gouden kruis, afkomstig uit het graf van koningin Gisela van Hongarije by Moulin

before 1864

Gouden kruis, afkomstig uit het graf van koningin Gisela van Hongarije

Listen to curator's interpretation

0:00
0:00

Curatorial notes

Editor: Here we see an image of the Golden Cross, coming from the tomb of Queen Gisela of Hungary, and it dates before 1864. It seems to be a print of an engraving, perhaps with watercolour. The detail is incredible. How should we interpret the opulence of this object? Curator: The opulence isn't merely decorative; it's tied to the material cost and labour involved in producing such an object. Think about the sourcing of the gold, the gemstones, and the skill needed for the engraving. Was this piece of jewellery made in series, or was this handcrafted? That difference says a lot. What impact did such objects have in cementing both Gisela and the church as economic powers? Editor: So, it's about understanding the social and economic networks behind the cross’s creation and the symbolic work it does? It wasn’t *just* a devotional object, but a signifier of wealth and control? Curator: Precisely. Consider also the act of engraving itself, a reproductive medium making the image and, by extension, Gisela's power more broadly accessible through prints like this one. Does the image soften, or make starker, any contemporary views of that power? Editor: I hadn't considered the print itself as part of that economic and power dynamic. Thinking about accessibility through print makes me wonder, if this image has an intended viewer who may never view the physical artwork itself? Curator: Exactly. Think about how such reproductions further distributed and perhaps sanitized that initial act of craftsmanship. It invites considerations about authenticity, labor, and value within distinct social and political hierarchies. What might someone in 1864 have understood about value, and how might this influence production techniques? Editor: That’s a really different way of approaching it than I had anticipated. Focusing on the means of production and dissemination sheds new light on the cross’s function and importance. Curator: Agreed! It is very enlightening to think about this artifact as a form of labor relations. It transforms my perspective, too!