Portret van Friedrich I, koning van Pruisen 1701 - 1713

Editor: This is "Portrait of Friedrich I, King of Prussia," an engraving on paper by Martin Bernigeroth, dating from around 1701 to 1713. The image feels very controlled and symbolic, like every element is carefully placed to convey a specific message about power. What do you see in this piece, beyond the immediately obvious regal presentation? Curator: Beyond the obvious, I see a carefully constructed narrative of legitimacy. The visual language is almost entirely built upon recognizable symbols – the crown, the armor, the flowing drapery – all referencing historical notions of kingship. How do these elements function as more than just decorative details, but as arguments? Editor: Arguments? Do you mean the symbols are actively trying to persuade the viewer of something? Curator: Precisely. Look at the armor, not just a sign of martial prowess, but an emblem connecting Friedrich to a lineage of warrior-kings, even though this portrait marks his ascendancy towards becoming the King and emphasizing royalty. How does the juxtaposition of the King, with his somewhat aloof gaze, and the heraldic symbols beneath him contribute to this persuasive quality? Editor: I guess it's creating a sense of established authority, like he's not just a king, but a king with deep roots and a right to rule? Even the crown behind him, it’s like foreshadowing. Curator: Exactly. And what does it mean to create this argument in visual form? What remains unspoken, and implied? What kind of memory does it want to establish for the future? Editor: That's a great point. It's less about an actual likeness and more about creating a lasting image of power, connecting him to a visual history of kingship. I see now that it really is arguing for his place in that history. Thanks, that really changed my perspective.