Portrait of Benjamin Franklin by Auguste Toussaint Lecler

1818 - 1848

Portrait of Benjamin Franklin

Listen to curator's interpretation

0:00
0:00

Curatorial notes

Curator: There’s a gravitas to this portrait of Benjamin Franklin. Did you catch that, Auguste Toussaint Lecler created this work sometime between 1818 and 1848. It is on view at The Met. Editor: Yes, quite striking! I feel like he's peering right into my soul, challenging my understanding of civic duty. There's something both comforting and unsettling about the lithograph; it almost breathes with history, but like a phantom caught on paper. Curator: Right? There’s this soft yet piercing gaze—perhaps that Neoclassical nod to the ancient philosophers. It draws me in but doesn't give away secrets. And the fur collar! Such a tactile delight captured in graphite on paper. It's both real and imagined. Editor: Precisely! We're meant to contemplate Franklin not just as a man but as an emblem. And who gets to become an emblem, eh? The quiet politics in portraiture of this type and period often escape conversation. Look closely; whose image wasn't printed and distributed like this one, especially given Franklin’s position as both diplomat and... slave owner. Curator: I feel what you mean! It definitely prompts me to consider the nuances we rarely delve into when looking back at history. Also, there's this understated elegance... a bit seductive really, how the light graces his face. A very flattering depiction overall. Editor: Agreed! But maybe that seductive light only served to amplify existing power structures. Lecler offers an idealized portrayal which is not unusual for depictions of political elites from the era. And if that gaze is beckoning us, who is “us”? Are we really invited into the fold? Curator: That is a point well-taken. Perhaps, the lithograph leaves us wrestling with the man versus the monument, light against shadow, and ultimately, what stories remain unseen. Thank you for lending your view; it's such a rich perspective! Editor: Absolutely. Seeing artworks as both reflections of the past and active participants in today's critical discourse...that's what brings history into a new, urgent kind of light, don't you think?