Antoninianus of Gallienus c. 3th century

Editor: So, this is an Antoninianus of Gallienus from the Harvard Art Museums. It's surprisingly small. How do we understand a piece like this in its historical moment? Curator: Well, the Antoninianus was a Roman coin, and Gallienus ruled during a tumultuous period. Coins like this weren't just currency; they were tools of propaganda. How do you think the image on the coin would have been received? Editor: I guess it's meant to project power and stability, but it looks worn, maybe even a little desperate? Curator: Exactly. The coin's condition speaks volumes about the era's economic instability and the emperor's efforts to maintain control through imagery. It reflects the public role of art in shaping perceptions of power. Editor: I hadn't considered the wear and tear as part of the message itself. Thanks! Curator: My pleasure. It’s amazing to see how a tiny object can reveal so much about the politics of imagery.