Twee koppen en profil c. 1935 - 1940

Editor: Here we have "Twee koppen en profil," or "Two heads in profile," a pencil drawing by Leo Gestel, made around 1935 to 1940. The starkness of the lines and the averted gaze create a sense of isolation. What do you see in this piece, beyond the apparent simplicity? Curator: I see a reflection of the turbulent times in which it was created. Gestel, while not explicitly political in much of his art, lived through periods of intense social and political upheaval. The sketch's incompleteness, the lack of background, even the seeming anonymity of the figures, could be interpreted as a response to the uncertainty and instability that many felt. Do you think the "two heads" suggest any specific relationship or tension? Editor: It’s interesting that you mention tension, I hadn't considered that at first glance. But now I see that they aren’t explicitly interacting. Their separation is notable, given the context. Could the rough sketch quality be interpreted as a commentary on the dehumanization prevalent during that era? Curator: Exactly! The lack of refined detail invites us to consider how individuals can be reduced and stripped of their individuality. It subtly speaks to themes of marginalization and the precariousness of identity when faced with oppressive forces. Also, remember that the concept of 'portrait' shifted greatly in this time. Gestel seems less interested in capturing a likeness than exploring states of being. Does the medium, pencil on paper, itself carry any weight, in your view? Editor: I see your point. The fragility of the medium – pencil on paper – might further highlight vulnerability. The work’s unpretentious nature feels intentional. I see how the social and political landscape of the time would greatly affect the artist. I really appreciate learning how art reflects cultural influences, making us reconsider the work's purpose and its impact. Curator: And it reminds us that even seemingly simple images can hold profound commentaries on the human condition and the weight of history.