Ruiterstandbeeld van Karel de Grote in Luik 1855 - 1875

Editor: This is a stereograph titled "Equestrian Statue of Charlemagne in Liège," dating from between 1855 and 1875. It seems to combine photography and printmaking. There’s a stateliness to the image; the figure is really commanding the urban space. What can you tell me about it? Curator: This work provides a fascinating lens through which to consider the construction of historical narratives and power. Charlemagne, elevated in bronze, becomes a symbol ripe for interrogation. Consider: who commissioned this statue and why, in that specific historical moment? What socio-political agendas were at play when deciding how to represent Charlemagne? Editor: So it’s less about Charlemagne the person, and more about what he represents? Curator: Precisely. The image acts as propaganda, even. Look at the architectural setting. It places Charlemagne in a distinctly European cityscape. How does this contribute to notions of national identity and historical continuity? Also, consider the impact of its distribution through print. Did it perpetuate a specific, and potentially skewed, understanding of European history? Editor: That makes me consider who was left out of this narrative. I was initially focused on Charlemagne's dominance, but understanding its role in constructing a selective historical memory is fascinating. Curator: Exactly! How can we challenge this single story and bring other perspectives to light? How might this monument relate to the legacy of colonialism or the suppression of marginalized groups? Engaging with art in this way allows us to think critically about the narratives that shape our world.