Johannes Gutenberg (ca. 1393/1400–1486): Commemorative of the Erection in New York by Robert Hoe of a Statue of Gutenberg in 1889 by Anton Scharff

1889

Johannes Gutenberg (ca. 1393/1400–1486): Commemorative of the Erection in New York by Robert Hoe of a Statue of Gutenberg in 1889

Listen to curator's interpretation

0:00
0:00

Curatorial notes

Curator: Let's turn our attention to this commemorative medal of Johannes Gutenberg by Anton Scharff, created in 1889. It marks the erection of a statue of Gutenberg in New York by Robert Hoe. Editor: My initial impression is of weightiness and formality. The monochrome palette and the sculpted relief give it a stern, almost unapproachable quality. Curator: Indeed. The medal serves not just as a portrait but as a socio-historical marker, commemorating Gutenberg within the narrative of technological advancement and transatlantic cultural exchange. This act of erecting a statue reflects the 19th-century's valorization of the printing press. It tells a story about power, access to knowledge, and the shifting dynamics between Europe and America. Editor: The artist’s emphasis on profile directs the viewer’s eye along very controlled paths. The texture of Gutenberg's beard and fur hat are skillfully rendered, creating areas of concentrated detail within the otherwise smooth surface. I notice how Scharff uses light and shadow to define the contours, especially around the face. Curator: I see Gutenberg here as a symbol of revolution—the printing revolution that democratized text and transformed society. The inscription detailing his dates reinforces this sense of him as a pivotal historical figure, grounding the art piece in the narrative of modernity, of Europe in particular. It's essential to think about who commissioned this piece and their stake in shaping public memory around the Gutenberg myth. Editor: The circular shape focuses my attention entirely on the bust, enhancing its symbolic nature. There are no distracting backgrounds. The medal isolates Gutenberg as a signifier. It removes him from a complex network of causes and relations, creating a single powerful impression. Curator: Thinking about that commission reminds me how much monuments and commemorative works can serve hegemonic functions, solidifying dominant narratives while marginalizing alternative voices and histories. Commemoration involves power dynamics of inclusion and exclusion. Editor: The composition is a fascinating exercise in control and constraint, isn't it? The tonal shifts subtly model the subject within this two-dimensional space, a remarkable demonstration of sculptural form rendered in relief. Curator: Looking closely, this piece prompts reflection on technology, power, and the politics of memory, it helps us think critically about who gets remembered and how, reminding us that historical narratives are never neutral or innocent. Editor: Yes, but at the level of form it is a beautiful and carefully-calibrated rendering of a significant cultural and technological icon.