Ce qui nous prouve comme quoi il est ... inutile ... c. 19th century

Editor: This lithograph by Honoré Daumier, "Ce qui nous prouve comme quoi il est... inutile..." from around the 19th century, depicts a theater audience. The graphite work feels critical, almost cynical. What's your read on this, looking beyond just the surface portrayal? Curator: It's a fascinating critique of social performance, isn't it? Daumier consistently used his art to question the power dynamics of his time. Notice how the women in the foreground, presumably bourgeois, are drawn with a particular focus on their… let’s say, unidealized features? Editor: I see that, yes. They aren't particularly flattering depictions. Is that his commentary? Curator: Exactly! It's worth noting the broader historical context: The July Monarchy in France was characterized by increasing social stratification and the rise of the bourgeoisie. Daumier, through his caricatures, consistently challenged their values and pretensions. This scene subtly questions their refined culture. The caption implies polite applause is 'useless.' Consider it through a critical lens of class and gender. Who gets to participate in culture and whose voices are deemed 'useless'? Editor: That makes so much sense now, especially positioning it within that political and social framework. So, he is almost weaponizing art to resist… Curator: Precisely. He's not merely observing; he's actively subverting the dominant narratives of his time. Daumier gives us a glimpse into the uncomfortable realities hidden beneath polite society, inviting us to do the same. What has been deemed 'good taste', or not. Editor: I will never be able to casually regard 19th century French art again. Thanks. Curator: That’s the power of engaging with art through a critical, socially aware perspective. There is always so much more beyond appearances!