1840
Vive la France, Marchands de "Tableaux" se Preparant pour la Vente Publique / Picture "Dealers" Preparing for "Auction"
Listen to curator's interpretation
Curatorial notes
Curator: Let's discuss this fascinating lithograph, "Vive la France, Marchands de 'Tableaux' se Preparant pour la Vente Publique / Picture 'Dealers' Preparing for 'Auction'," dating back to 1840. It resides here at the Met. Editor: My immediate impression is a calculated farce. The piece is undeniably unsettling; the staged scene drips with a disturbing irony. There’s a definite performative aspect to their roles as “art dealers”. Curator: It’s ripe with symbols, wouldn't you agree? Notice the central figure, seemingly adding finishing touches to a rather explicit nude. It feels like a pointed commentary on artistic and cultural pretensions, maybe a reflection on the taste of the art market. Editor: Exactly, and I see a staged narrative playing out, look at the printed text, the large font and deceptive phrases, clearly meant for easy consumption by the buyer. Who gets to decide if this painting of a reclining nude constitutes art? How about those being employed, consider their stake in the production and auction process? Curator: True, it is hard to not feel uneasy by what we see happening in the work. Look at the racial undertones conveyed in the artwork through the black child, seemingly subserviently engaged with the ingredients to re-paint artwork... his stance seems a visual metaphor for subjugation within the art world. Editor: And the materials—the pigments, the canvas, the printmaking itself—they are not innocent. It’s the systematic creation of value out of literally nothing, through skilled labor. What exactly were they covering with the 'master' formula, were old, problematic, images updated and re-fashioned for an eager market? Curator: Perhaps Baker is offering a biting critique of authenticity and commodification in art. Are they actually celebrating artistic innovation, or revealing a calculated performance, cynically exploiting cultural aspirations and market dynamics? The title declares 'Vive la France', but it reads dripping with sarcastic skepticism about its meaning and value. Editor: I am left with an unsettling feeling, thinking how so many artists become products themselves to be exploited and consumed. "Vive la France," indeed. What sort of auction will this turn out to be?